The American Academy of Pain Medicine      Annual Meeting Home Page     
23rd Annual Meeting
February 7-10, 2007
New Orleans, LA

© 2006 American Academy of Pain Medicine
 


Thursday, February 8, 2007
129

Validation Study of the Self-Administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs by Mailed Survey in a Community Setting

Toby N. Weingarten, MD1, James C. Watson, MD1, W. Michael Hooten, MD1, Peter C. Wollan, PhD2, Adam J. Locketz1, L. Joseph Melton III, MD1, Gilbert Y. Wong, MD1, and Barbara P. Yawn, MD, MSPH, MSc2. (1) Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA, (2) Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, MN, USA

Introduction The self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs (S-LANSS) is a self-administered assessment tool designed to identify patients with neuropathic pain and has been validated in un-aided and survey formats in subjects treated at a tertiary pain referral center with a pain secialist's clinical assessment(1). The S-LANSS has not been validated as a mailed survey in community subjects with chronic pain by clinical assessment.

Methods 5897 Olmsted County residents were surveyed via mail to assess for chronic pain, complete the S-LANSS and self-report the presence of neuropathic pain. Clinical records were reviewed to identify ICD-9 codes suggestive of neuropathic pain(2). Residents with a positive response to any of the three tools were considered candidates for neuropathic pain and invited to participate in a clinical assessment by a pain specialist. 26 subjects with chronic pain but not considered candidates underwent clinical assessment as controls. Agreement between the S-LANSS and clinical assessment for the presence of neuropathic pain was determined.

Results 205 subjects (179 candidates, 26 controls) participated. 83 subjects had a positive S-LANSS score. Clinical assessment revealed 75 subjects had neuropathic pain; 117 subjects had nociceptive pain; 10 subjects had resolution of pain; and 3 subjects had an unclear diagnosis. 6 controls had the presence of neuropathic pain by clinical assessment. The S-LANSS compared to clinical assessment had a sensitivity of 57.3% (95%CI 45.4 – 68.7) and a specificity of 69.3% (95%CI 60.5 – 77.2).

Discussion The sensitivity and sensitivity of the mailed S-LANSS was less in this study than the initial validation study, which reported a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 76%(1). These findings suggest that the S-LANSS is less robust as an assessment tool for neuropathic pain when used as part of a mailed survey or with subjects in a community setting.


References: 1. Bennett, M. I.; Smith, B. H.; Torrance, N.; Potter, J. The S-LANSS score for identifying pain of predominantly neuropathic origin: validation for use in clinical and postal research. J Pain 2005; 6: 149-58.

2. Berger, A.; Dukes, A.M.; Oster, G. Clincal Characteristics and Economic Costs of Patients with Painful Neuropathic Disorders. J Pain 2004; 5: 143-9.
Funding: This work was supported by a grant from AstraZeneca

Toby N. Weingarten, MD
Nothing to disclose.