The American Academy of Pain Medicine      Annual Meeting Home Page     
23rd Annual Meeting
February 7-10, 2007
New Orleans, LA

© 2006 American Academy of Pain Medicine
 


Thursday, February 8, 2007
143

Tramadol Contramid® OAD: A Placebo-controlled Study Demonstrates Efficacy and Safety in the Management of Pain

Ritchard Fishman, MD1, Francis X. Burch, MD2, Nicholas Messina III, MD3, Bruce C. Corser, MD4, Florin Radulescu, MD5, Adrian Sarbu, MD6, Maria Marcela Craciun-Nicodin, MD7, Rodica Chiriac, MD8, André Beaulieu, MD9, Jude Rodrigues, MD10, Philippe Beignot-Devalmont, MD11, Alain Duplan, MD11, Sybil Robertson, BScN12, Louise Fortier, MSc12, and Sylvie Bouchard, MD, PhD12. (1) Rheumatology Clinic, Pico Rivera, CA, USA, (2) Radiant Research, San Antonio, TX, USA, (3) Vista Medical Research Inc., Mesa, AZ, USA, (4) Community Research, Cincinnati, OH, USA, (5) Centrul de Boli Reumatismale "Dr Ion Stoia", Bucharest, Romania, (6) Centrul Medical Sana, Bucharest, Romania, (7) Cabinet Medical Individual, Bucharest, Romania, (8) Spitalul Clinic de Recuperare, Iasi, Romania, (9) Université Laval, Qubec, QC, Canada, (10) Rhumatology Clinic, Windsor, ON, Canada, (11) Clinique de Rhumatologie, Rouen, France, (12) Labopharm Inc, Laval, QC, Canada

1028 patients with pain due to osteoarthritis of the knee were enrolled in this multi-center, randomized, double-blind parallel study designed to assess the analgesic efficacy and safety of Tramadol Contramid® OAD versus placebo.

 

This study consisted of a Tramadol Contramid® OAD open-label phase followed by a double-blind phase. A total of 646 patients were randomized to double-blind treatment with placebo or Tramadol Contramid® OAD. The dose was then titrated to 300 mg and could be decreased to 200 mg if 300 mg was not tolerated. The optimal dose was then maintained for a period of 12 weeks. The protocol was approved by a properly constituted investigational review board.

 

The absolute mean improvement in Pain Intensity Numerical Rating Scale (PI-NRS) throughout the study was significantly greater for Tramadol Contramid® OAD compared to the placebo (p < 0.0001), based on a time-weighted analysis. A responder analysis demonstrated that a significantly greater percentage of patients in the active treatment arm achieved a reduction in the PI-NRS score from baseline to the end of the study (p = 0.035 for a reduction of ≥2 points). A greater percentage of respondents in the Tramadol Contramid® OAD group indicated improvement on both the Patient and Physician Global Impressions of Change (p = 0.0002 and p = 0.0042, respectively) compared the placebo group. Both the 200 mg and 300 mg doses contributed to the improvement in PI-NRS scores associated with Tramadol Contramid® OAD versus placebo. Consistent with the commonly reported side effects of tramadol, the most frequent adverse events during the double-blind maintenance phase were nausea (15%), constipation (14%), dizziness/vertigo (10%), and somnolence (7%), the majority of which were mild to moderate in intensity.

 

These results support the use of Tramadol Contramid® OAD given once daily as an efficacious and safe treatment for pain due to osteoarthritis.


References: Mongin G, Yakusevich V, Kope A, Shostak N, Pikhlak E, Popdan L, et al. Efficacy and safety assessment of a novel once-daily tablet formulation of tramadol. Clin Drug Invest 2004;24(9):545-8
Funding: None

Ritchard Fishman, MD
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Labopharm Inc, Researcher/clinical in vestigator