The American Academy of Pain Medicine      Annual Meeting Home Page     
24th Annual Meeting
February 13-16, 2008
Orlando, FL

© 2006 American Academy of Pain Medicine
 


Thursday, February 14, 2008
126

Buccal and Sublingual Administration of Fentanyl Buccal Tablet Are Bioequivalent: A Randomized, Open-Label, Single-Dose, Crossover Study

Mona Darwish1, Mary Kirby1, John G. Jiang1, Philmore Robertson Jr.2, and William G. Tracewell2. (1) Cephalon, Inc., Frazer, PA, USA, (2) Cephalon, Inc., West Chester, PA, USA

Introduction: Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) provides early-onset analgesia after buccal placement by enhancing fentanyl absorption. Bioequivalence of FBT placed buccally and sublingually was assessed to explore administration options.

Materials and Methods: Healthy adults were randomized to receive one 400-µg FBT buccally (above a molar tooth between upper gum and cheek) and sublingually, with an intervening ≥7-day washout. Naltrexone was administered to minimize opioid effects. Peak plasma fentanyl concentration (Cmax), area under the fentanyl concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞), AUC from time 0 to median buccal tmax (AUC0-tmax') and time to Cmax (tmax), were assessed through 72 hours postdose. Bioequivalence was declared if the 90% CIs of the treatment ratios (sublingual/buccal) for AUC0-∞ and Cmax were within 0.80-1.25. Tablet residue was inspected at 15 and 30 minutes. An IRB approved the protocol, and subjects provided written informed consent.

Results: Ninety subjects enrolled; 78 completed the study (mean age, 27 years). Plasma concentration-time curves were nearly identical after buccal and sublingual administration. Mean Cmax after buccal vs sublingual administration was 0.97 vs 0.85 ng/mL (ratiosublingual/buccal = 0.87 [90%CI: 0.82, 0.92]). Mean AUC0-∞ was 6.22 vs 5.88 ng•h/mL (ratiosublingual/buccal = 0.95 [90%CI: 0.90, 0.99]). The CIs of the ratios showed bioequivalence of buccal and sublingual administration. Median tmax and mean AUC0-tmax' were also similar following buccal and sublingual administration. Adverse events (AEs) in these naltrexone-blocked, nonopioid-tolerant healthy subjects (eg, headache, nausea, dizziness, and fatigue) were mild, with no meaningful between-treatment differences. Application-site AEs occurred in 12% and 5% of subjects following buccal and sublingual administration, respectively. Fewer subjects had FBT residue 15 and 30 minutes after sublingual administration (2% and 1%, respectively) than after buccal administration (36% and 15%).

Conclusions: FBT administered buccally and sublingually provided bioequivalent pharmacokinetic profiles in healthy subjects. These findings may expand administration options for FBT.


References: Portenoy RK, Messina J, Xie F, et al. Fentanyl buccal tablet (FBT) for relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-treated patients with chronic low back pain: a randomized, placebo-controlled study. Curr Med Res Opin 2007;23:223-233.

Slatkin NE, Xie F, Messina J, et al. Fentanyl buccal tablet for relief of breakthrough pain in opioid-tolerant patients with cancer-related chronic pain: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study. J Support Oncol 2007;5:327-334.
Funding: Study sponsored by Cephalon, Inc.

Mona Darwish
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Cephalon, Inc., Employee; Patent pending for use of FBT in patients with mucositis