The American Academy of Pain Medicine      Annual Meeting Home Page     
24th Annual Meeting
February 13-16, 2008
Orlando, FL

© 2006 American Academy of Pain Medicine
 


Thursday, February 14, 2008
175

Lacosamide in Long-Term Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Ronald Graf, MD1, Wendy Frye2, and Jeffrey Simpson2. (1) Cedar Research, Tacoma, WA, USA, (2) SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES, Inc., Raleigh, NC, USA

Objective: Lacosamide is being investigated as an anticonvulsant with potential for reducing diabetic neuropathic pain.

Background: Lacosamide is a functionalized amino acid that has shown activity in a wide-range of animal models for pain and epilepsy.

Methods: In this ongoing, open-label trial, subjects enrolling from one of three preceding trials are titrated to their optimal lacosamide dose (100-600 mg/day) in weekly increments of 100 mg/day prior to entering a long-term maintenance period. Dose adjustments are allowed as necessary. Pain is assessed by twice-daily diary entries using an 11-point Likert scale, and the Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) is assessed periodically.

Results: As of the interim analysis cut-off, February 10, 2006, 451 subjects received lacosamide in this trial; 314 (69.6%) subjects were ongoing. Twelve subjects (2.7%) discontinued due to lack of efficacy. The mean number of days of exposure was 216 and the maximum duration of lacosamide exposure was 516. The most common doses were 400 mg/day (26.4% of subjects) and 600 mg/day (22.0% of subjects). The mean Likert pain score at Baseline was 6.35. The mean Likert pain score at the end of titration and after 6, 12, and 18 months in the maintenance phase was 2.78, 2.16, 2.33, and 2.28, respectively. After 6-months in the maintenance phase, 96.2% of subjects reported feeling better (PGIC response of much better, moderately better, mildly better) versus 3.8% reporting either no change or worse. The proportion of subjects reporting feeling better at 12- and 18-months in maintenance was 95.8% and 96.4%, respectively.

Adverse events (AEs) were the primary reason for premature discontinuation (12.4% of subjects). The most frequently reported AEs in long-term use included dizziness (19.5%), upper respiratory infection (11.1%), nausea (9.8%), and headache (8.6%).

Conclusion: These data support the continued development of lacosamide in painful diabetic neuropathy.


References: Beyreuther BK, Callizot N, Brot MD, Feldman R, Bain SC, Stohr T. Antinociceptive efficacy of lacosamide in rat models for tumor- and chemotherapy-induced cancer pain. Eur J Pharmacol. Jun 22 2007;565(1-3):98-104.

Beyreuther B, Callizot N, Stohr T. Antinociceptive efficacy of lacosamide in a rat model for painful diabetic neuropathy. Eur J Pharmacol. Jun 6 2006;539(1-2):64-70.

Brandt C, Heile A, Potschka H, Stoehr T, Loscher W. Effects of the novel antiepileptic drug lacosamide on the development of amygdala kindling in rats. Epilepsia. Nov 2006;47(11):1803-1809.
Funding: Supported by UCB, Inc.

Ronald Graf, MD
Conflict of Interest Disclosure: Schwarz Pharma, Grant/research Support