The American Academy of Pain Medicine      Annual Meeting Home Page     
24th Annual Meeting
February 13-16, 2008
Orlando, FL

© 2006 American Academy of Pain Medicine
 


Thursday, February 14, 2008
193

Pain Medicine and primary care: A community solution to a population with chronic pain

Joe Beck, MD, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA, Fred N. Davis, MD, Michigan Pain Consultants, Grand Rapids, MI, USA, and Rollin M. Gallagher, MD MPH, University of Pennsylvania, Penn Pain Medicine, Philadelphia, PA, USA.

Objective:

The public health problem of chronic pain cannot be solved by sending 50 million Americans to a relatively few pain specialists. The pain medicine and primary care community rehabilitation model(PMPCCRM) proposes that pain specialists collaborate with primary care providers to address the needs of a community population. Pro-Care of Michigan overcame significant barriers to address chronic pain in a small city surrounded by suburban and rural communities. Pro-care provides educational sessions for community physicians, easy access for referrals, and a collaborative model of care.

Methods:

500 patients treated for two years were randomly selected from the Pro-Care database. After IRB approval, an adaptation of the Brief Pain Inventory, the Cumulative Pain Inventory Questionnaire, was mailed to all identified patients. 235 patients consented and answered questions by phone or mail. Pre- and –post treatment scores on pain, walkng, gender and age were compared.

Results:

Mean pain scores declined by 2.68, from 8.04(SD 1.76) to 5.36(2.22), p < 0.001. Pre-treatment pain of the 70 males was lower than the 165 females (7.70 vs. 8.20, p=0.045) as was post-treatment pain (4.78 vs 5.59, p=0.01), and declined slightly more (2.9 versus 2.59, p=0.40). Pre-treatment pain predicted post-treatment pain (Spearman correlation: rho=0.181, p=0.005). whereas neither age (rho = -0.048, p=0.46) nor change in pain (rho = -0.009, p=0.89) predicted pos-treatment pain.

After treatment, males walked more minutes(63.38 + 24.9 versus 50.49 + 29.6, p=0.002) and worked longer (54.44 + 23.7 versus 47.3 + 25.3, p=0.044) although correction for multiple comparisons retained only walking as significantly different. Over sixty percent reported over fifty percent improvement in general activity, walking, working, daily mood, and interpersonal relations.

Discussion:

These results demonstrate that a collaborative care model between pain medicine and primary care can produce impressive results and must be replicated in larger, well- controlled prospective community studies.


References: Disease Management by Warren E. Todd and David Nash, MD

Fishman S, Gallagher RM, Carr D, Sullivan L. The case for pain medicine as a medical specialty. Pain Med 2004;5(3):281-286

Gallagher RM. Pain medicine and primary care: A community solution to pain as a public health problem. Medical

Clinics of North America 83(5): 555-585, 1999

Wiedemer N, Gallagher R , Harden P, Arndt R,. Effects of a Structured Opioid Therapy Program, Using Treatment Agreements, Urine Drug Screens, and Consultation, on Primary Care Practice. Pain Med. 2007;8(7):553-564.
Funding: None

Joe Beck, MD
Nothing to disclose.